- June 28, 2020
- Posted by: dawgenglobal
- Categories: Accounting and Consulting Firms, Advisory
Facing so many economic challenges, Caribbean Governments have been looking to the private sector as a reliable partner to boost economic value added and
labour growth. However, this expectation has never been grounded in fact, as there is no empirical study of the Caribbean private sector. Therefore, this study is
ground-breaking because it provides a comprehensive empirical analysis of the Caribbean business
The report revisits the theme of low Caribbean growth, viewed through a macroeconomic lens in our previous
report (Is there a Caribbean Sclerosis?),but takes a microeconomic perspective by using firm-level
The performance of the private sector is crucial for a country’s economic growth and employment generation. As such, the results of the analysis are not comforting. In terms of sales growth, employment growth, efficiency, and total factor productivity, the Caribbean underperforms the rest of the small economies of the world.
The gap is larger for commodity-dependent economies (Guyana, Suriname, and Trinidad and Tobago) than for tourism-dependent economies (Barbados, Jamaica, and The Bahamas). Thus, the existing Caribbean business sector is not up to the challenge to increase the region’s economic growth and employment and hence, to increase public resources and improve the welfare of citizens in the region.
Why? The report uses multiple approaches to identify the constraints to the private sector, constraints include the role of firm characteristics and constraints, including international trade and foreign direct investment, financing, crime, inadequate labour, electricity issues, lack of innovation, gender disparity, and government policies that are not good for business.
The study estimates the contribution to the performance gap of the region’s existing endowments (i.e., the characteristics and constraints of the firms) as well as the returns to those characteristics and constraints. It finds that the returns contribute more to the gap than do characteristics and constraints themselves.
While this Report was published in 2016 , it is still relevant in 2020!! Get the full Report here : Full-Report