The world of business is a battleground, where incumbents and newcomers constantly vie for market share. It’s a dynamic ecosystem in which competition is a key driver of innovation and improvement. However, some established firms, known as incumbents, have found a way to neutralize the threat from up-and-coming competitors by employing a strategy known as “catch and kill.”
The catch and kill approach is an often-controversial competitive tool. Its effectiveness lies in its simplicity and brutality: an incumbent buys an insurgent competitor not to leverage its innovation or to merge its operations, but to shutter it entirely. This move effectively extinguishes the innovative fire that the insurgent company might have brought to the market, securing the incumbent’s position.
The principle of the approach is straightforward. When a newcomer enters the market with a novel product or service, it disrupts the status quo. This insurgent competitor presents a threat to the established players, potentially undermining their customer base and profitability. The incumbents, to maintain their market dominance, then purchase the insurgent company. Post-acquisition, instead of integrating the new firm’s innovations into their operations, they completely dissolve the firm, hence ‘catching’ and ‘killing’ the competition.
Many argue that this approach is highly effective as a competitive tool. Not only does it neutralize the immediate threat, but it also sends a chilling message to other potential disruptors in the marketplace. By demonstrating a willingness and ability to simply buy out and shut down any emerging competition, incumbents can discourage entrepreneurial activity and maintain their dominance.
However, the approach is not without controversy. Critics argue that the catch and kill strategy stifles innovation and competition, the very elements that keep an industry vibrant and consumer-friendly. It allows incumbents to maintain their dominance, not by improving their products or services or by responding to consumer needs, but by snuffing out competition.
Dr. Dawkins Brown, the Executive Chairman of Dawgen Global, is one such critic. Speaking about the catch-and-kill strategy, he says, “While it might seem like an effective competitive tool in the short-term, ‘catch and kill’ is a strategy that undermines the foundational principles of a healthy market economy. It’s a brute force approach that stifles innovation and restricts consumer choice, in the end, it harms the very ecosystem it’s meant to protect.”
Moreover, the catch and kill approach has legal and regulatory implications. Many jurisdictions have laws in place to protect competition, and such strategies could run afoul of these laws, leading to significant legal and financial penalties for the incumbents.
While the ‘catch and kill’ approach may be an effective tool for maintaining market dominance in the short term, it raises significant questions about the long-term health of the business ecosystem. It poses a challenge for regulators, incumbents, and insurgent companies alike to strike a balance between competition, innovation, and market stability.
About Dawgen Global
Dawgen Global is an international professional services firm that specializes in providing comprehensive business solutions across various industries. With a focus on accounting, taxation, auditing, business advisory, and management consulting, Dawgen Global caters to clients of all sizes, from small businesses to large multinational corporations.
At Dawgen Global we help you make Smarter and More Effective Decisions .
We offer BIG FIRM Capabilities without a big firm PRICE !!
Next Step!
Contact Dawgen Global Team at: [email protected] for a free 1-hour consultation to discuss your needs
