Decoding IAS 28 Revisions: Transforming Equity Method Practices for the Future

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has recently released an Exposure Draft aimed at revising IAS 28, Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures. This initiative seeks to address longstanding application challenges, enhance comparability across financial statements, and improve the overall understandability of the equity method. These changes are particularly significant for entities using IAS 28 to account for investments, as they present opportunities for standardization while introducing complexities for preparers. This article unpacks the key proposals, their implications, and the challenges they aim to resolve.

The Equity Method: Key Proposals and Their Implications

1. Measurement of Cost

One of the critical proposals in the Exposure Draft is the alignment of cost measurement with IFRS 3 (Business Combinations). The IASB recommends using the fair value of the consideration transferred to measure the cost of an associate or joint venture upon obtaining significant influence. Additionally, contingent considerations will now be included as part of this fair value, with subsequent remeasurements recognized in profit or loss for liabilities and excluded for equity instruments.

Implications:

• Aligning with IFRS 3 principles ensures consistency in accounting practices.
• Preparers must invest in robust valuation methods, especially for contingent considerations, which may require significant time and resources.

2. Recognition of Transactions

A significant shift in the proposals involves recognizing full gains or losses from transactions with associates and joint ventures. Currently, IAS 28 mandates partial recognition based on unrelated investors’ interests. The proposed changes aim to harmonize this with IFRS 10 (Consolidated Financial Statements), ensuring full recognition.

Implications:

• This adjustment simplifies accounting by eliminating the need to track unrealized gains or losses over time.
• Concerns about potential earnings management and structuring of transactions may arise, necessitating enhanced scrutiny from regulators and auditors.

3. Changes in Ownership Interests

The IASB proposes a layered approach for accounting for additional ownership interests. Each acquisition would be treated as a separate unit of account, with the investor’s share of the associate’s net assets remeasured at fair value.

Implications:

• This approach ensures consistency with existing IFRS standards like IFRS 11 (Joint Arrangements).
• However, it introduces complexity, requiring preparers to perform purchase price allocations (PPA) for each acquisition layer, significantly increasing compliance costs.

4. Enhanced Disclosures

The Exposure Draft proposes additional disclosures to increase transparency, including:

• Reconciliation of the opening and closing carrying amounts of investments.
• Details on gains or losses from transactions with associates and joint ventures.
• Specific information on contingent consideration arrangements.

Implications:

• Users of financial statements will benefit from clearer insights into the performance and valuation of equity-accounted investments.
• Preparers may face challenges in gathering and presenting this information, particularly when dealing with complex arrangements.

5. Impairment Testing Refinements

The IASB recommends replacing the current reference to “cost” with “carrying amount” for assessing declines in fair value. Additionally, the “significant or prolonged” decline criterion will be removed, aligning IAS 28 with IAS 36 (Impairment of Assets).

Implications:

• This change aligns the equity method with other IFRS standards, simplifying its application.
• However, the removal of the “significant or prolonged” criterion may increase the frequency of impairment tests, adding to preparers’ workloads and potentially increasing volatility in financial statements.

Challenges and Stakeholder Feedback

While the IASB’s proposals address inconsistencies in IAS 28, they also introduce complexities. Stakeholders have expressed mixed feedback, particularly on the following:

• Cost and Complexity: The layered approach for additional ownership interests is seen as burdensome, requiring extensive valuation efforts and data collection.
• Transition Requirements: The retrospective application of recognizing full gains or losses from past transactions has raised concerns among preparers regarding practicality and resource allocation.
• Disclosure Requirements: Though beneficial for transparency, the proposed disclosures may impose significant costs, particularly for entities with extensive equity-accounted investments.

Practical Recommendations for Preparers

To adapt effectively to these changes, entities can consider the following:

1. Leverage Technology: Utilize advanced valuation tools and automated systems to streamline the computation and reporting of fair values and contingent considerations.
2. Enhance Internal Processes: Establish clear protocols for tracking ownership interest changes and maintaining accurate data for reconciliation purposes.
3. Engage with Stakeholders: Collaborate with auditors, regulators, and internal teams to ensure compliance while managing costs.
4. Stay Informed: Actively participate in consultations and stay updated on IASB developments to influence the final standard and prepare for implementation.

The IASB’s proposed revisions to IAS 28 mark a pivotal moment in the evolution of the equity method of accounting. These changes aim to address critical application challenges that have plagued preparers and auditors for years, enhance comparability across financial statements, and align practices with broader IFRS principles. By bringing greater transparency and consistency to financial reporting, the Exposure Draft seeks to provide users with clearer insights into the performance and valuation of equity-accounted investments.

However, these benefits come with challenges. Preparers must navigate increased complexities, such as performing purchase price allocations (PPA) for additional ownership interests, ensuring compliance with enhanced disclosure requirements, and adapting to changes in the recognition of transactions and impairment testing. While these requirements are designed to improve financial reporting, they also demand significant investments in time, expertise, and technology, especially for entities with extensive equity-accounted portfolios.

For stakeholders, including preparers, investors, and regulators, the key lies in balancing these demands with the broader goal of producing high-quality, comparable financial information. This balancing act requires a proactive approach:

• Engaging During the Consultative Phase: The IASB’s ongoing consultations offer stakeholders a valuable opportunity to provide feedback and shape the final standard. Entities should actively participate in these discussions, sharing insights on practical implementation challenges and potential cost-benefit concerns. By doing so, they can advocate for solutions that address both conceptual consistency and real-world feasibility.
• Investing in Robust Systems and Expertise: To manage the increased complexity, entities must prioritize the development of internal capabilities. Investing in advanced financial systems, valuation tools, and staff training will not only aid compliance but also improve efficiency in managing equity-accounted investments. Collaboration with auditors and valuation specialists will further ensure accuracy and alignment with the revised requirements.
• Maintaining Transparency and Communication: The enhanced disclosure requirements present an opportunity for entities to build trust with investors and other stakeholders. By providing detailed, transparent information on gains, losses, and ownership changes, preparers can offer deeper insights into their investment activities, fostering confidence in their financial reporting.

The proposed revisions to IAS 28 represent a step forward in the global effort to standardize and improve accounting practices. While the road ahead may be challenging, the end goal—a more transparent, reliable, and comparable reporting environment—is well worth the effort. By leveraging technology, engaging with the IASB, and focusing on clarity in reporting, entities can not only comply with the new requirements but also enhance the value of their financial statements for all stakeholders.

As these changes unfold, the ability to adapt, innovate, and collaborate will define the success of entities in navigating this transformative era of accounting standards. The time to prepare is now.

Next Step!